With thirteen providers
processing payroll in eleven locations, large amounts of “human glue” holding everything
together and poor visibility into performance data, the situation at Dell’s Asia-Pacific
region two years ago will have been familiar to many companies approaching
multi-country payroll for the first time.
But as Ray
Porter, vice chair of Webster Buchanan’s Multi-country Payroll Forum and employee
services director at Dell, points out, centralizing and standardizing
multi-country payroll can pay big dividends. After a two-year re-engineering project
across Asia-Pacific and Japan, the company has almost completed its move to a
single platform for the entire region, with the vast majority of employees on
course to be paid by a single vendor from just two locations by the end of this
year. Remarkably, in the course of the project, Dell’s payroll function experienced
zero employee attrition – and it now boasts a 99.9% accuracy metric.
In an in-depth presentation
and discussion exclusively for members of Webster Buchanan’s Multi-country
Payroll Forum, Porter outlined the techniques he used to manage the
transformation. Breaking the project up into four phases – ‘explore’, ‘plan’, ‘develop’
and ‘deploy’ – the company took a structured approach and measured each step of
the way. “At the end of each phase, we made a decision whether to go onto the
next phase or not,” says Porter.
Porter’s
presentation included a detailed breakdown of the criteria for success and
potential pitfalls in each of the four phases of the project. Highlights
included:
- At the exploration phase - where Porter’s team was building its business case, getting
executive sponsorship and identifying potential suppliers – the key to success
was articulating a clear vision to the multiple stakeholders. Surprisingly,
Porter said the vision and desired end-state remained pretty much constant over
the entire course of the project. He added that when building the business case,
the focus should be on total value – not just cost per payslip – and should
include factors such as the cost of having poor controls, poor technology, and poor
quality service. Dell also undertook significant research into its current
capability, ensuring it had mapped and understood all of its processes before
putting together a Request for Information. Partly as a result, it was able to conduct
contract negotiations in less than a month from start to finish. Porter also
points out that companies should consider hiring a payroll transformation
expert, arguing that it will same time & money.
- At the planning phase, as well as conducting
gap analysis and preparing data, the key was in maintaining a lean, empowered
team. With just one full-time project manager, Dell called on the skills of in-country
payroll experts as it moved from country to country. Porter warned other
companies that potential pitfalls at this stage include clashes of culture
between the vendor and client, and failing to include a plan for disengagement
from current vendors within the overall project plan. There’s also a tendency
to micro-manage rather than leaving the team to look after the detail.
- At the development phase, which is where system
configuration and testing is carried out, the project is in full swing. But
there are still potential hiccups if communications aren’t satisfactory. “When
you are relying on payroll experts in-country to carry out user acceptance testing,
you need to ask them how they have tested it, and educate them on the testing
process and expectations,” he says. “It’s key to success that you involve the
right people in operations and make the most of local knowledge.” Porter also
warns that at this stage, as well as in subsequent parallel testing, it’s
important that errors are put into perspective – not every test error, for
example, will be critical.
- At the deployment phase, where live payroll is
being processed, the transition to the new set-up needs to be carefully
managed. Although Dell’s payroll function experienced zero attrition over the
two years of the project, it has released some people to other parts of the
project and ongoing standardization could release further resources. Porter also
recommends leaving sufficient time between go-live and embedding the ongoing
governance model.
Dell’s success
in consolidating across Asia-Pacific and Japan has come in part from its belief
at a high level that this was a vision worth pursuing - but also from a
detailed level of planning and communication at every stage of the rollout.
|