|
|
||
|
Starting out in multi-country Payroll |
||
How many of your international payroll operations are critically reliant on one person or one ageing system? What are the bottlenecks and pain points that hamper your payroll processes? Is government bureaucracy really as convoluted as you fear in countries with a reputation for complexity? And are physical infrastructure issues likely to impact your ability to drive through change?
These and a host of other issues confront anyone starting
out on a multi-country payroll project, whether they’re managing a handful of countries
or have a large global footprint spanning multiple continents. The potential
benefits of a multi-country payroll project may be alluring – from centralizing
control over your international operations to improving compliance, increasing
efficiency, standardizing on best practices and in some cases, reducing cost.
But putting the principles into practice is a little more involved. Webster Buchanan Research gave an overview of these issues
at the American Payroll Association’s Annual Congress in Long Beach, California
this month. The workshop was led by Keith Rodgers, co-founder of Webster
Buchanan Research, and Alan Wigley, an independent consultant and European
vice chair of Webster Buchanan’s Multi-country Payroll Forum. The workshop ranged across several topics that will be
addressed in more depth in a series of web seminars produced by Webster
Buchanan’s Global Academy, which will be launched on July 2nd. The presentation began by focusing on ways to analyze the
status quo in each international payroll operation, focusing on high-level
issues relating to the team and the set-up. Payroll managers will want to look
at what skills and knowledge they’re inheriting, for example – but also at any
friction and critical dependencies that need to be factored into a change
program. If a small country operation is highly dependent on one person’s
knowledge of an ageing in-house system, for example, that represents both a
risk to address and a special factor to accommodate during a transition
project. Similarly, there are multiple issues to examine in the current payroll
set-up, from the degree of process automation to how effectively outsourcers’ service
quality is measured and managed. The assessment moves on to examine country-specific issues –
ranging from cultural differences to the practicalities of working across
multiple time zones – before addressing one of the most critical issues, compliance.
While most parts of the initial status quo assessment can be carried out at a
high-level, the presenters stressed that multi-country payroll managers need to
get a comprehensive understanding of their major compliance responsibilities as
early as possible, including past performance and upcoming requirements. While
much of this information should be provided by the in-house team, there are
half a dozen potential sources of information that can be consulted to unearth
and validate compliance requirements, from payroll institutes and associations
to vendors and personal networks. The status quo assessment continues with a brief overview of
payroll performance, using the five key indicators outlined in Webster
Buchanan’s Payroll Performance Scorecard – timeliness, accuracy,
compliance, cost and employee satisfaction. Among other highlights of the presentation, Webster Buchanan
looked at: The workshop concluded with a brief analysis of the vendor
equation, exploring the on-premise and outsourcing options that are available
on a regional or trans-continent basis. This included an analysis of the
different types of outsourcing services available, from traditional managed
services providers to business process outsourcers, payroll brokers that aggregate
services from different country specialists, and software as a service providers. The conclusion was that companies should: To find out more about
the upcoming multi-country payroll web seminars from Webster Buchanan’s Global Academy,
contact us in confidence The leading
multi-continent software and service providers are analyzed in depth in Webster
Buchanan’s Multi-country Vendor Review, a 40 page independent research report
published last summer and due to be updated in June 2009.
|
||
|
For Disclaimer and Copyright Notice, click here. © Webster Buchanan Research 2010 |
